Top tweets from the Conference on Robot Learning #CoRL2021
[ad_1]
The Conference on Robot Learning (CoRL) is an annual international conference specialised in the intersection of robotics and machine learning. The fifth edition took place last week in London and virtually around the globe. Apart from the novelty of being a hybrid conference, this year the focus was put on openness. OpenReview was used for the peer review process, meaning that the reviewers’ comments and replies from the authors are public, for anyone to see. The research community suggests that open review could encourage mutual trust, respect, and openness to criticism, enable constructive and efficient quality assurance, increase transparency and accountability, facilitate wider, and more inclusive discussion, give reviewers recognition and make reviews citable [1]. You can access all CoRL 2021 papers and their corresponding reviews here. In addition, you may want to listen to all presentations, available in the conference YouTube channel.
In this post we bring you a glimpse of the conference through the most popular tweets written last week. Cool robot demos, short and sweet explanation of papers and award finalists to look forward to next year’s edition in New Zealand. Enjoy!
Robots, robots, robots!
Papers and presentations
Ever wondered how to tune your hyperparameters while training RL agents? w/o running thousands of experiments in parallel? And even combine them?
Check out our work @ #CoRL2021 on training mixture agents which combines components with diverse architectures, distributions, etc pic.twitter.com/4tsqWXjf79
— Markus Wulfmeier (@markus_with_k) November 9, 2021
Awards
References
tags: c-Research-Innovation, Event
Daniel Carrillo-Zapata
was awared his PhD in swarm robotics at the Bristol Robotics Lab in 2020. He now fosters the culture of “scientific agitation” to engage in two-way conversations between researchers and society.
Daniel Carrillo-Zapata
was awared his PhD in swarm robotics at the Bristol Robotics Lab in 2020. He now fosters the culture of “scientific agitation” to engage in two-way conversations between researchers and society.
[ad_2]
Source link